E46Fanatics

E46Fanatics (http://forum.e46fanatics.com/index.php)
-   Forced Induction Forum Sponsored by Active Autowerke (http://forum.e46fanatics.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   Jake's HPF Built Motor w/6766 Upgrade (http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=944621)

HPF Kirk 09-14-2012 05:46 PM

Jake's HPF Built Motor w/6766 Upgrade
 
So Jake came in for same maintenance and 6766 upgrade, I wanted to show before and after results and we will have more pictures from Kris here in the next few days.

http://blog.horsepowerfreaks.com/wp-.../MG_0403-1.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FziEo7agrA8

Pump and Meth for the Win! :evil: We added about 2lbs of boost as well. For some reason the before run from last year didn't have boost referenced on it. :facepalm:

http://www.horsepowerfreaks.com/publ...g2.5RPMSAE.gif

0-60motorsports 09-14-2012 05:58 PM

Wow those are some great results

leletyM3 09-14-2012 06:37 PM

Wow what a nice gain for just a turbo upgrade!!

PatmanSC 09-14-2012 06:55 PM

awesome numbers

sounds awesome too, hope mine is similar and makes similar power

niiice

AirFrcd 09-14-2012 08:45 PM

very impressive #s

PH03NIX46 09-14-2012 09:15 PM

Sweet numbers!

My buddy just bought a 6466 and he wants to know why you went with a 6766.

Apparently the 6466 makes the same power with the spool curve of a 6266. Aside from the 6766 having a better top end.

MarcusLSB 09-15-2012 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PH03NIX46 (Post 14732927)
Sweet numbers!

My buddy just bought a 6466 and he wants to know why you went with a 6766.

Apparently the 6466 makes the same power with the spool curve of a 6266. Aside from the 6766 having a better top end.

The problem is everyone says it 'makes the same power, with the same this/that'... as what?.. a turbo on a different car, different motor, different manifold, different fuel? The 7275 supposedly spooled faster and made more power than the 7168.. until I swapped it in and found out it actually made the same power, and spooled slower. HPF has actually used a 6466 on a built low compression motor it wasn't as impressive as one would have thought (it was impressive comparatively but did not net the same results as it did on Larry's Supra if that's where you're getting your comparisons).. I still think the 6766 is a better choice for the S54.

Dreikraft 09-15-2012 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarcusLSB (Post 14733325)
The problem is everyone says it 'makes the same power, with the same this/that'... as what?.. a turbo on a different car, different motor, different manifold, different fuel? The 7275 supposedly spooled faster and made more power than the 7168.. until I swapped it in and found out it actually made the same power, and spooled slower. HPF has actually used a 6466 on a built low compression motor it wasn't as impressive as one would have thought (it was impressive comparatively but did not net the same results as it did on Larry's Supra if that's where you're getting your comparisons).. I still think the 6766 is a better choice for the S54.

my car didn't make very impressive numbers with the 6776, the 6466 numbers did not surprise me. im sure someone else could net better results w/6466....especially if they didn't care that the curve falls on its face up top in order to make a higher peak number earlier on.

Commanderwiggin 09-15-2012 02:31 AM

I've been told Ben's car spools like a ****ing beast...or so I'm told ;)

M5chas 09-15-2012 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AirFrcd (Post 14732885)
very impressive #s

You likes that huh Lberg!??!! :D

JakeR 09-15-2012 10:28 AM

Thanks All! Very happy w/ results. Should have her back in about 10 days. Can't wait to drive this BEAST!! Vids to follow.

JakeR 09-15-2012 10:36 AM

Thought about 6466. Main reason for 6766 was about 70WHP horsepower advantage for 6766 over 6466.

DOC_Race 09-17-2012 07:37 PM

Great dyno sheet! good to see results like that.

PH03NIX46 09-24-2012 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarcusLSB (Post 14733325)
The problem is everyone says it 'makes the same power, with the same this/that'... as what?.. a turbo on a different car, different motor, different manifold, different fuel? The 7275 supposedly spooled faster and made more power than the 7168.. until I swapped it in and found out it actually made the same power, and spooled slower. HPF has actually used a 6466 on a built low compression motor it wasn't as impressive as one would have thought (it was impressive comparatively but did not net the same results as it did on Larry's Supra if that's where you're getting your comparisons).. I still think the 6766 is a better choice for the S54.

Well that explains his thinking then.

He just bought his for his '04 STi.

lrinco01 10-09-2012 09:11 AM

ok, not bad ;-)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
(c) 1999 - 2011 performanceIX Inc - privacy policy - terms of use