E46Fanatics

E46Fanatics (http://forum.e46fanatics.com/index.php)
-   Political Talk (http://forum.e46fanatics.com/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Report: Bill would set an 8-year path to residency (http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=971545)

bimmerfan08 02-17-2013 10:21 AM

Report: Bill would set an 8-year path to residency
 
..

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House is circulating a draft immigration bill that would create a new visa for illegal immigrants living in the United States and allow them to become legal permanent residents within eight years, according to a report published online Saturday by USA Today.

President Barack Obama's bill would create a "Lawful Prospective Immigrant" visa for the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants living in the United States. The bill includes more security funding and requires business owners to adopt a system for verifying the immigration status of new hires within four years, the newspaper said.

USA Today reported that the bill would require that immigrants pass a criminal background check, submit biometric information and pay fees to qualify for the new visa. Immigrants who served more than a year in prison for a criminal conviction or were convicted of three or more crimes and were sentenced to a total of 90 days in jail would not be eligible. Crimes committed in other countries that would bar immigrants from legally entering the country would also be ineligible.

Those immigrants facing deportation would be eligible to apply for the visa, the newspaper reported. Immigrants would be eligible to apply for a green card within eight years, if they learn English and U.S. history and government, and they would later be eligible to become U.S. citizens.

Last month a bipartisan group of senators announced they had agreed on the general outline of an immigration plan. For his part, Obama has said he would not submit his own legislation to Congress so long as law makers acted "in a timely manner." If they failed, he said, "I will send up a bill based on my proposal and insist that they vote on it right away."

Clark Stevens, a White House spokesman, said Saturday that Obama still supports a bipartisan effort to craft a comprehensive immigration bill. "While the president has made clear he will move forward if Congress fails to act, progress continues to be made and the administration has not prepared a final bill to submit," he said in a statement.

Sen. Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican who has been crafting immigration legislation, derided the draft bill as described by the newspaper as "half-baked and seriously flawed" and said it was disappointing because it repeats what he called failures of past legislation. He also said the White House had erred in not seeking input from Republican lawmakers.

"If actually proposed, the president's bill would be dead on arrival in Congress, leaving us with unsecured borders and a broken legal immigration system for years to come," Rubio said in a statement.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, described the draft bill as a "very moderate" proposal. While the path to citizenship was welcomed by Noorani, he said not enough attention was being paid to future immigration.

"Commonsense immigration reform must include a functioning immigration system for the future," Noorani said in a statement. "Reform does not begin and end with citizenship and enforcement alone."

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/repor...path-residency

casino is no lie 02-18-2013 07:20 AM

Good.

2000_328CI 02-18-2013 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casino is no lie (Post 15172676)
Good.

Care to elaborate? Without securing the border, you're essentially offering this to anyone willing to travel to Mexico and walk across into the usa.

Even CNN is hounding the draft on their starting Monday program as I type this

rohde88 02-18-2013 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI (Post 15172696)
Care to elaborate? Without securing the border, you're essentially offering this to anyone willing to travel to Mexico and walk across into the usa.

Thats typically not true of "presence based" immigration. The petitioner would have the burden to prove they were present in the US at a certain point in time--probably a few years back.

This is common for certain residency reqs. Even for illegal aliens(EWI).

casino is no lie 02-18-2013 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI (Post 15172696)
Care to elaborate?

Because the American Dream.

NFRs2000nyc 02-18-2013 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casino is no lie (Post 15172676)
Good.

Yea. F*** those that waited in line, are waiting in line, spending 50K on lawyers to come here legally and pay their fair share. Excellent.

NFRs2000nyc 02-18-2013 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI (Post 15172696)
Care to elaborate? Without securing the border, you're essentially offering this to anyone willing to travel to Mexico and walk across into the usa.

Even CNN is hounding the draft on their starting Monday program as I type this

This country deserves the f***tards it elects.

NFRs2000nyc 02-18-2013 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rohde88 (Post 15172701)
Thats typically not true of "presence based" immigration. The petitioner would have the burden to prove they were present in the US at a certain point in time--probably a few years back.

This is common for certain residency reqs. Even for illegal aliens(EWI).

Because the government is so good at spotting the fake paper marriages ey? It can be "proven" with ease....without even being in the country.

casino is no lie 02-18-2013 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFRs2000nyc (Post 15172769)
Yea. F*** those that waited in line, are waiting in line, spending 50K on lawyers to come here legally and pay their fair share. Excellent.

You pin me as the type to cut off your nose to spite your face.

NFRs2000nyc 02-18-2013 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casino is no lie (Post 15172787)
You pin me as the type to cut off your nose to spite your face.

Ok then.

rdsesq 02-18-2013 11:32 AM

This is a leverage ploy. And a good one. "Here is what I will send to congress if you folks can't come up with one." Put some pressure on congress, and more specifically the GOP in congress to work up with a bi-partisan bill. Is it the far side of a the possible bill spectrum. Of course. If it was something the GOP side would favor, why do it. This is a cage rattler and a remind. "Look dudes and dudettes, I got re-elected. In four years I'm gone, never to return to the oval office. I got nothing to lose."

Its a warning shot across the bow, rather civilized action when it comes to politics.

And even it it were to be brought as is and pass into law. For all those harping on about "how it isn't fair on those that are going through the current process legally"...I suggest they realize, life isn't fair. This is immigration into the USA, and the USA has the right to change to rules and requirements into our country anytime we please. They don't like it. They can take their their 50K and lawyers and point it towards a different country. This is america...things aren't always fair.

NFRs2000nyc 02-18-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdsesq (Post 15173158)
This is a leverage ploy. And a good one. "Here is what I will send to congress if you folks can't come up with one." Put some pressure on congress, and more specifically the GOP in congress to work up with a bi-partisan bill. Is it the far side of a the possible bill spectrum. Of course. If it was something the GOP side would favor, why do it. This is a cage rattler and a remind. "Look dudes and dudettes, I got re-elected. In four years I'm gone, never to return to the oval office. I got nothing to lose."

Its a warning shot across the bow, rather civilized action when it comes to politics.

And even it it were to be brought as is and pass into law. For all those harping on about "how it isn't fair on those that are going through the current process legally"...I suggest they realize, life isn't fair. This is immigration into the USA, and the USA has the right to change to rules and requirements into our country anytime we please. They don't like it. They can take their their 50K and lawyers and point it towards a different country. This is america...things aren't always fair.

You do realize what this will mean right? It means that no one will ever again go through the process legally. There is no reason to. Its FAR easier to do it illegally. Just like guns, it is FAR easier to get a gun illegally than it is legally (in many states anyway.) I know this is just hot air, since a bill like this would NEVER pass, but just the fact that we would allow them a path to residency without fixing everything else is nothing short of insanity.

I also love your hypocrisy....I have yet to see you make comments like this;

1) "Those homosexuals can get the hell out and go live on some island where they can stick each other all day long."

2) "Those lazy blacks that sit on welfare, pop out 15 kids a piece and use the abortion revolving door should just go live on an island somewhere or go somewhere else where they can get their problems paid for."

You seem to stick up for illegals just fine, but immigrants contributing to the US, following the law of this land, and doing things the right way deserve to be punished. If that isn't libtard logic, I don't know what is. Only a liberal can be ok with ILLEGAL immigration, but tell LEGAL immigrants to f*** off elsewhere.

And one more thing....the US has the RIGHT or Duty if we are talking facts here to ENFORCE the laws they create, not ignore them, and write new ones.

bimmerfan08 02-18-2013 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdsesq (Post 15173158)
This is a leverage ploy. And a good one. "Here is what I will send to congress if you folks can't come up with one." Put some pressure on congress, and more specifically the GOP in congress to work up with a bi-partisan bill. Is it the far side of a the possible bill spectrum. Of course. If it was something the GOP side would favor, why do it. This is a cage rattler and a remind. "Look dudes and dudettes, I got re-elected. In four years I'm gone, never to return to the oval office. I got nothing to lose."

Its a warning shot across the bow, rather civilized action when it comes to politics.

And even it it were to be brought as is and pass into law. For all those harping on about "how it isn't fair on those that are going through the current process legally"...I suggest they realize, life isn't fair. This is immigration into the USA, and the USA has the right to change to rules and requirements into our country anytime we please. They don't like it. They can take their their 50K and lawyers and point it towards a different country. This is america...things aren't always fair.

You're very hypocritical and a flip flopper. You'd fit in well with the rest of Washington. :P

PNWDiego 02-18-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casino is no lie (Post 15172676)
Good.

+1 :woot:

2000_328CI 02-18-2013 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFRs2000nyc (Post 15173235)
You do realize what this will mean right? It means that no one will ever again go through the process legally. There is no reason to. Its FAR easier to do it illegally. Just like guns, it is FAR easier to get a gun illegally than it is legally (in many states anyway.) I know this is just hot air, since a bill like this would NEVER pass, but just the fact that we would allow them a path to residency without fixing everything else is nothing short of insanity.

I also love your hypocrisy....I have yet to see you make comments like this;

1) "Those homosexuals can get the hell out and go live on some island where they can stick each other all day long."

2) "Those lazy blacks that sit on welfare, pop out 15 kids a piece and use the abortion revolving door should just go live on an island somewhere or go somewhere else where they can get their problems paid for."

You seem to stick up for illegals just fine, but immigrants contributing to the US, following the law of this land, and doing things the right way deserve to be punished. If that isn't libtard logic, I don't know what is. Only a liberal can be ok with ILLEGAL immigration, but tell LEGAL immigrants to f*** off elsewhere.

And one more thing....the US has the RIGHT or Duty if we are talking facts here to ENFORCE the laws they create, not ignore them, and write new ones.

Exactly right...

Life isn't fair if you're a law abiding citizen looking to come to the usa...

But bastardized anyone looking to say "life isn't fair" in response to those looking to increase the welfare state, push for gay rights, etc...

Hypocrisy as usual from the left.

casino is no lie 02-18-2013 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI (Post 15173346)
Life isn't fair if you're a law abiding citizen looking to come to the usa...

Why would you be looking to come to the USA if you're already a citizen?

2000_328CI 02-18-2013 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casino is no lie (Post 15173382)
Why would you be looking to come to the USA if you're already a citizen?

:facepalm: law abiding citizen.. Of another country.

If you want to legally enter the usa, liberals are asking you to take a back seat to individuals whose first action on our soil was to break the law.

So it's tough luck if you're a moral person... It's welcome to America if you're a criminal.

Life must be fair to gays, transgenders, and every other fringe group... But law abiding forefingers looking to obey the law must NOT get treated fairly... They must take a back seat.

Act of God 02-18-2013 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI (Post 15173346)
Exactly right...

Life isn't fair if you're a law abiding citizen looking to come to the usa...

But bastardized anyone looking to say "life isn't fair" in response to those looking to increase the welfare state, push for gay rights, etc...

Hypocrisy as usual from the left.

If I'm rich and you are poor, life isn't fair. I guess that's the new mantra? I can deal with that

rapier7 02-18-2013 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFRs2000nyc (Post 15173235)
You do realize what this will mean right? It means that no one will ever again go through the process legally. There is no reason to. Its FAR easier to do it illegally. Just like guns, it is FAR easier to get a gun illegally than it is legally (in many states anyway.) I know this is just hot air, since a bill like this would NEVER pass, but just the fact that we would allow them a path to residency without fixing everything else is nothing short of insanity.

I also love your hypocrisy....I have yet to see you make comments like this;

1) "Those homosexuals can get the hell out and go live on some island where they can stick each other all day long."

2) "Those lazy blacks that sit on welfare, pop out 15 kids a piece and use the abortion revolving door should just go live on an island somewhere or go somewhere else where they can get their problems paid for."

You seem to stick up for illegals just fine, but immigrants contributing to the US, following the law of this land, and doing things the right way deserve to be punished. If that isn't libtard logic, I don't know what is. Only a liberal can be ok with ILLEGAL immigration, but tell LEGAL immigrants to f*** off elsewhere.

And one more thing....the US has the RIGHT or Duty if we are talking facts here to ENFORCE the laws they create, not ignore them, and write new ones.

Bad argument. Assuming immigration reform gets passed this year, 27 years will have elapsed between the 1986 immigration amnesty and this one. That's a long time to wait for amnesty. The ones who came here legally already got to work legally and contribute to their Social Security plans and enjoyed the full protection of the law.

You act as if illegal immigrants and legal immigrants were in the same socioeconomic class. For the most part, they are not. Me and my parents came here legally. I don't feel betrayed by the Federal government if they bestow legal status on those illegals.

that_one_guy 02-18-2013 03:28 PM

Funny how conservatives have no problem with people who illegally enter from Cuba, just Mexico.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
(c) 1999 - 2011 performanceIX Inc - privacy policy - terms of use