View Single Post
Old 10-28-2010, 08:30 PM   #33
AAblown
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: tampa, fl
Posts: 796
My Ride: e46 m3, e36 m3, H2
i would disagree with this. Im making 380hp without pullies, and most of my mods come from AA. Thats a big jump over stock. And i have dyno sheets to prove it. I dont try to push anyones products, but i can say what worked for me. And i dont have to send my software to anyone. My installer (LUTZ) has AA's computer to do it themselves.

PS i love lamp...........and stickers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman00 View Post
I'm going to go against my first impulse and try and explain this to you in a less harsh manner.

The Shark Injector doesn't cause the vanos rattle, cams do, and it's usually exclusive to ZHP and Shrick cams. I've yet to find one thread claiming a vanos rattle in conjunction with using Shark, so don't lie to push a product. It doesn't help the OP, and it doesn't help the community as a whole.

Further more, I gained 14whp DYNO PROVEN with a shark and intake, and have yet to find ANY dyno data (provided by shark or otherwise) proving the gains of AA software. Jim C. on the other hand, has made a database of dynos for every car and every injector he he sells, not to mention the most powerful N/A cars on this site use SHARK software.

And I'd be wary of AA's claims of tuning for your parts, how would they be able to measure the A/F ratio and airflow of one intake vs another, or header, or exhaust, or proper cam timing vs stock cams on your car without it being present? Just like Shark, AA uses a cookie cutter tune which may, or my not be better. But without data all we have if fanboy hearsay.

Finally, Shark is a flash module, you can do it in your garage in 20 minutes. AA requires you send them your email to flash it. No thanks.

And I don't put stickers on my car.
__________________
AAblown is offline   Reply With Quote