02-05-2013, 11:18 AM
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Isla de Muerta | DC/VA
My Ride: 328Ci | Range Rover
Call me crazy, but that is a FAR MORE ACCURATE representation than the inverse (where that household is counted as one individual. After all, each of those mouths marks an increase in the amount of "welfare" which must be provided to that single household.
Originally Posted by evolved
That chart is so skewed it's ridiculous. Let's take this example.....if you are on disability and you have a wife, 4 kids, an elderly parent and a disabled brother living with you that graph will count 8 people as "being on welfare".
Go look at sites like the US Department of Commerce, or the US Department of Health & Human Services. Here's a nice summary for you:
But if these data points are viewing a single household as a single person, that number is skewed. If you have a husband, wife, 4 kids, and two parents living in a household where nobody works, what is the total number of people on government assistance? 2? 4? 8?
Originally Posted by casino is no lie
Doesn't seem accurate when compared to other sources.
Total number of Americans on welfare; 4,300,000
Total number of Americans on food stamps; 46,700,000
Total number of Americans on unemployment insurance; 5,600,000
Percent of the US population on welfare; 4.1 %
Total government spending on welfare annually (not including food stamps or unemployment); $131.9 billion
Date Verified: 10.15.2012
Source: US Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Commerce, CATO Institute
Source Link: http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
To me, that is 8 people dependent on the government for their livelihood.
| 435 HP 328Ci
| Mechanical Work : RRT Racing | Vinyl Work : Designer Wraps | Vorsteiner | STATUS Racing |
Timeless Motor Group
Last edited by 2000_328CI; 02-05-2013 at 11:19 AM.