Uh oh, global warming models wrong? *gasp*

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI

What is dishonest about his statement? Watch any show on creation v evolution and they will present countless top names from the science world who believe strongly in intelligent design.

You really want to get this debate rolling? Go in one of the countless evolution/creationism threads and I will hand you your rear.

This one: Awesome simple evolution comic
Or this one: A argument for creationism
We can go in an F2B thread if you want: Is my friend correct on this theory...

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI

My views aren't based on what a man in a black suit with white collar told me.. it's based on the odds.

Odds are there's no god. But that's neither here nor there. It's not the topic of the thread.

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI

I don't find his statement to discredit him in the least nor do I believe his findings to be as insignificant as you suggest.

What exactly are his findings? In your own words, please.

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI

Again, my views on global warming are based on what seems like a long history of dishonesty.

So, not on data? Not on scientific consensus? Color me shocked.

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI

the scientists credited with much of Gore's later points came out to be frauds and liars (Climategate)

There was no such thing as Climategate. All scientists involved were absolved of any wrongdoing other than some colorful language perhaps.

Originally Posted by 2000_328CI

and more data has been presented as of late disproving CC than bolstering it.

Such as?