Canon 6D Full Frame Announced - Page 2 - E46Fanatics E46 BMW Social Directory E46 FAQ 3-Series Discussion Forums BMW Photo Gallery BMW 3-Series Technical Information E46 Fanatics - The Ultimate BMW Resource BMW Vendors General E46 Forum The Tire Rack's Tire Wheel Forum Forced Induction Forum The Off-Topic The E46 BMW Showroom For Sale, For Trade or Wanting to Buy

Go Back   E46Fanatics > Everything Else > The Off-Topic > Photography

Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-15-2012, 05:47 AM   #21
B8888KC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Where bimmers are overpriced
Posts: 1,435
My Ride: Old fart E46 sedan
I guess the megapixel war is over, taken over by iso war. I dont understand the need for iso 102800. I know it's a good camera with minimal noise, but who would wanna take unusable pictures? Pics taken at iso 102800 would look worse than a 1.3 mp cellphone camera. Maybe there are people who choose to use high iso over slower shutter speed and bigger aperture. Nonetheless, the 6d looks like a solid camera. I dont care much about af points. This is the camera that canon fans had been waiting for since... Forever. I'm keeping my 5d2 though
B8888KC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 05:50 PM   #22
grkm3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,908
My Ride: Money Pit
Send a message via AIM to grkm3
The 5D3 is a worthy upgrade from the 5D2. I can't say the same about the 6D.
__________________
SOLD
03 Steel Gray M3 - Imola Red Interior - SMGII - Premium - HK Sound
Mods: VFE SC Stage 2, SS Ceramic Coated Stepped Headers, S-Pipe, X-Pipe, TMS Subframe Reinforcement, KWV2 Coilovers, TMS Camber Plates, Powerflex RTAB's, Rogue RSM's, ZCP F/R brakes

Coming Soon: Open to suggestions

grkm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 02:32 AM   #23
saxual328ci
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,653
My Ride: 2004 325ci
Quote:
Originally Posted by B8888KC View Post
I guess the megapixel war is over, taken over by iso war. I dont understand the need for iso 102800. I know it's a good camera with minimal noise, but who would wanna take unusable pictures? Pics taken at iso 102800 would look worse than a 1.3 mp cellphone camera. Maybe there are people who choose to use high iso over slower shutter speed and bigger aperture. Nonetheless, the 6d looks like a solid camera. I dont care much about af points. This is the camera that canon fans had been waiting for since... Forever. I'm keeping my 5d2 though


I would think if you have an ISO 102800, then all the others below it would be more usable. I shoot occasionally at 1600ISO, and my camera goes up higher but I don't use it cause its not that good.I could go 6400ISO but its not good. If I had a camera that has an ISO102800 then I can use 6400ISO. I saw this foto today and thought it was pretty decent exposure


http://www.flickr.com/photos/jpivkova/8276211774/

ISO25600 with D600.



D600 kit $2k vs 6D kit $2700


The shutter on both cameras is still pretty fast compared to what was out years ago. Even if you shoot rapid fire, you will probably use only 2-3 of those images. Shutter speed is fine. Frames per second is shorten because of the buffering. (my guess). lol
__________________
saxual328ci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 04:56 PM   #24
grkm3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,908
My Ride: Money Pit
Send a message via AIM to grkm3
Nikons have slightly better dynamic resolution. Something I envy a little with my 5dIII. I was seriously considering picking up a D800 instead but had invested too much in EOS gear.
__________________
SOLD
03 Steel Gray M3 - Imola Red Interior - SMGII - Premium - HK Sound
Mods: VFE SC Stage 2, SS Ceramic Coated Stepped Headers, S-Pipe, X-Pipe, TMS Subframe Reinforcement, KWV2 Coilovers, TMS Camber Plates, Powerflex RTAB's, Rogue RSM's, ZCP F/R brakes

Coming Soon: Open to suggestions

grkm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 05:45 PM   #25
cowmoo32
.--. . -. .. ...
 
cowmoo32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 5,545
My Ride: Yukon, E92 M3
Dynamic resolution?
__________________
cowmoo32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 03:14 AM   #26
B8888KC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Where bimmers are overpriced
Posts: 1,435
My Ride: Old fart E46 sedan
Holy sh1t that's iso 25600? Damn i've been missing out lol
B8888KC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 01:37 PM   #27
328iGuy
SensFan
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: [Ottawa | Canada]
Posts: 381
My Ride: 2012 Audi Q7 S-Line
Quote:
Originally Posted by grkm3 View Post
Nikons have slightly better dynamic resolution. Something I envy a little with my 5dIII. I was seriously considering picking up a D800 instead but had invested too much in EOS gear.
lol....do you mean dynamic range, is in HDR type shots?
__________________
Canon 5DIII | 35L | 16-35L II | 24-70L II| 85L II 1.2 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 600EX |
328iGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Censor is ON



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
(c) 1999 - VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.