9/11 was an inside job - E46Fanatics E46 BMW Social Directory E46 FAQ 3-Series Discussion Forums BMW Photo Gallery BMW 3-Series Technical Information E46 Fanatics - The Ultimate BMW Resource BMW Vendors General E46 Forum The Tire Rack's Tire Wheel Forum Forced Induction Forum The Off-Topic The E46 BMW Showroom For Sale, For Trade or Wanting to Buy

Welcome to the E46Fanatics forums. E46Fanatics is the premiere website for BMW 3 series owners around the world with interactive forums, a geographical enthusiast directory, photo galleries, and technical information for BMW enthusiasts.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   E46Fanatics > Everything Else > The Off-Topic > General Off-Topic

General Off-Topic
Everything not about BMWs. Posts must be "primetime" safe and in good taste. You must be logged in to see sub-forums.
Click here to browse all new posts.

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-30-2012, 09:24 AM   #20
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So Cal - 310
Posts: 991
My Ride: 04 330Ci ZHP
Originally Posted by ramtin325i View Post
If im not mistaken, the owner of the twin building went over and up-ed his insurance for the towers a week before the incident.

You tell me?
Unless you can cite a reliable source, I'll tell you that you are mistaken.

Originally Posted by wrighterjw10 View Post
actually, thats not correct. the towers were privately held at the time of the attacks. Held privately for the first time ever in May of 2001. Also keep in mind that pre-9/11 terrorism coverage was VERY rare for ANYONE to take or even offer. But, when the private firm that held the towers bought the building, they took out a handsome amt in terrorism coverage.

i'm not trying to convince anyone of a conspiracy either, just offering some facts.
Please offer correct facts, then.

Silverstein leased them, but Port Authority still owned them.

It was late July, not May: http://web.archive.org/web/200109041...ase.php3?id=80

And it would seem the policies were still being sorted out at the time of the attacks: http://www.economist.com/node/2656873

The dispute over the World Trade Centre arose because Mr Silverstein-who leased it in the summer of 2001-was still finalising his insurance policy when the buildings were destroyed.
There's a difference between "still finalizing" and "inexplicably increased at the last minute".

In addition, did he actually have "terrorism insurance" or was it disaster insurance that pretty much every commercial building has?

Lastly, after Feb 93, it would be pretty foolish NOT to have insurance that covered damage from terrorism.
We will not tolerate intolerance.

Last edited by Xcelratr; 12-30-2012 at 09:27 AM.
Xcelratr is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Censor is ON

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
(c) 1999 - VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.