E46 BMW Social Directory E46 FAQ 3-Series Discussion Forums BMW Photo Gallery BMW 3-Series Technical Information E46 Fanatics - The Ultimate BMW Resource BMW Vendors General E46 Forum The Tire Rack's Tire Wheel Forum Forced Induction Forum The Off-Topic The E46 BMW Showroom For Sale, For Trade or Wanting to Buy

Welcome to the E46Fanatics forums. E46Fanatics is the premiere website for BMW 3 series owners around the world with interactive forums, a geographical enthusiast directory, photo galleries, and technical information for BMW enthusiasts.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   E46Fanatics > Everything Else > The Off-Topic > Political Talk

Political Talk
You may discuss anything regarding politics in this forum ONLY. If you cannot respect others opinions, your access to this forum will be removed.

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-15-2013, 01:09 PM   #17
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 129
My Ride: 2001 M3 Coupe
Originally Posted by Act of God View Post
Rand Paul's stance on all of this is pretty good; why is government even allowed to have a say in this?
I've never quite understoon this, some, well most to be honest, Republicans who on the one hand espouse freedom, individualism and escaping from under some oppressive government yet in the next breath have no compunction about interjecting, by dint of law and punishment, the heavy hand of government to arbitrate and dictate our most personal and private aspects of our lives. Many of these are basically trying to interject and interpose a veiled or not so veiled theocracy into our national civil life (DOMA), never mind the First Amendment of the Constitution they declare such stringent fealty to.

I wish more GOP/TPers would espouse the same sanctity of the private bedroom as they do the sanctity of the corporate boardroom.

While I dont' agree with Rand Paul on a whole lot, I think he's basically right here in that government should have little say in this realm and what say it does have should be unbiased with regard to gender.

I think the French have it right in that the government officiates over a civil union, say over at the local courthouse that morning, while couples are then free to sanctify their union however they see fit by whatever faith institution they subscribe to, say at the local church that afternoon. Call the civil union just that and the faith based sanctification a marriage just to keep it clear.

As for Portman's announcement, good, I'm glad he did, I think it was the right thing to do, if belatedly. We should actually congratulate, not chide, Portman for publicly supporting his son and subsequently gay marriage rather than trying to distance himself or sweep the situation under the rug.
But hey, better late than never.

I guess my one dismay is that it is only after a deeply personal involvement that too many GOP/TPers come around to a more caring and less judgemental, and prejudgiced, position. When its "them," a harsh, cold judgementalism. When its suddenly one of their own, their own family, sudden conversion to warm empathy, caring and understanding. I guess when your beliefs are centered narrowly around self and individual achievement, empathy is often hard to find. It never means anything to too many republicans until it affects them personally...from unemployment to healthcare to gay rights. We're trying to have a society here...can you people please think of others BEFORE you are directly impacted.

I do think Portman's position regarding leaving the question of marriage equality to the states is wrong. Human rights are human rights--not states' rights. The state's rights approach was tried with slavery and that ended badly (Civil War). DOMA denies protections and benefits to people who share their lives with the same intentions as my wife and partner of 15 years and I do and is clearly unconstitutional as now even many conservatives are arguing, even to the Supreme Court.

Last edited by Rhumb; 03-15-2013 at 01:10 PM.
Rhumb is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Censor is ON

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
(c) 1999 - 2016 performanceIX Inc - privacy policy - terms of use