Kpeng for Moderator

Originally Posted by kpeng

That is kind of a joke in my sig, I guess if some people take it too seriously, I'll remove it.

I guess it depends on how serious you are on this becoming a mod thing

Originally Posted by 00bmw323

how much money do you need to donate to be Purple?????

9.99 for OEM Member (basic purple)
19.99 for Modded Member (more goodies )

Originally Posted by cngzsn

ok, then remove "destroyer of the noobs" from your slogan and you might get more sympathy from them...

FWIW, I'm usually very nice to people who ask legitimate questions and seek information. I try to be as helpful as possible as you can see in my many replies in the General forum. See for yourself.

Originally Posted by cngzsn

I guess it depends on how serious you are on this becoming a mod thing

lol, look at Jon Jon, the guy frickin' banned himself.

Originally Posted by deafboy

9.99 for OEM Member (basic purple)
19.99 for Modded Member (more goodies )

wat do you have??

You need to clarify your statements.
If your any kind of serious about this and want to be taken seriously you need to kill the jokes, not the n00bs.
There is no room for misinterpritation if your serious about this.
Being a mod is serious business, to be taken seriously you have to act seriously. So all this talk of banning mawfukaz for what is apparently no reason, does NOT belong here. Maybe later on, you can make those jokes, but right now u had me like, wtf, is he for real? Thank god this isn't real.

Ill edit while I still can but you gotta be crystal clear about your message. This is internet, I can't see the smirk on your face while you post, and neither can the thousands of other members.

Originally Posted by kpeng

FWIW, I'm usually very nice to people who ask legitimate questions and seek information. I try to be as helpful as possible as you can see in my many replies in the General forum. See for yourself.

I know how helpful you are, just trying to point that the definition of a legitimate question might vary according to how many posts they have.

Originally Posted by snikwad

You need to clarify your statements.
If your any kind of serious about this and want to be taken seriously you need to kill the jokes, not the n00bs.
There is no room for misinterpritation if your serious about this.
Being a mod is serious business, to be taken seriously you have to act seriously. So all this talk of banning mawfukaz for what is apparently no reason, does NOT belong here. Maybe later on, you can make those jokes, but right now u had me like, wtf, is he for real? Thank god this isn't real.

Ill edit while I still can but you gotta be crystal clear about your message. This is internet, I can't see the smirk on your face while you post, and neither can the thousands of other members.

I think you're taking this way more seriously than I am. I said it in my original post already, this is half for-fun, half serious. I think I've been clear enough, interpret it as you wish. I assure that "bans" won't be handed out like free stickers, to anyone who doesn't agree with me, or gives me attitude. The person's post history, and general attitude towards other members will be taken into account. Scammers, like they are no, will be shown no mercy, nor will people who falsely advertise things for sale. Relax man, I told you I'd give latin women a chance just for you

Originally Posted by cngzsn

I know how helpful you are, just trying to point that the definition of a legitimate question might vary according to how many posts they have.

Understood.

I guess I am taking this more seriously.

Originally Posted by kpeng

I think you're taking this way more seriously than I am. I said it in my original post already, this is half for-fun, half serious. I think I've been clear enough, interpret it as you wish. I assure that "bans" won't be handed out like free stickers, to anyone who doesn't agree with me, or gives me attitude. The person's post history, and general attitude towards other members will be taken into account. Scammers, like they are no, will be shown no mercy, nor will people who falsely advertise things for sale. Relax man, I told you I'd give latin women a chance just for you

don't mean to intrude but most definitely, latin women are FTMFW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I would like to be serious for a second here though and propose a few ideas that I'd like to see happen regardless of if I actually, by some miracle of god, become a moderator.

1. I propose that we not allow new members to create new threads of their own until they've hit a certain post count. I don't know, maybe 50 or 100 posts? That will encourage searching, thus eliminating repetitive threads, as well as prevent spammers from registering to make ad threads.

2. I'd like to see some better sales system implemented in the classifieds section. For starters, it'd be cool to list a member's "feedback" on the sidebar so that prospective buyers can instantly see their reputation.

3. Is there a way to code the site so that anyone who tries to quote a post that contains a long series of photos is not allowed to do so? It makes reading threads much more tedious and unnecessary.

I'm trying to tell the young boy that while the snow bunnies are def nice, there's too many wonderful flavors to limit yourself to one.

Its just not right. Jolly rancher bags don't come with just apple flavor. There's something for everyone to try a few

Originally Posted by kpeng

I would like to be serious for a second here though and propose a few ideas that I'd like to see happen regardless of if I actually, by some miracle of god, become a moderator.

1. I propose that we not allow new members to create new threads of their own until they've hit a certain post count. I don't know, maybe 50 or 100 posts? That will encourage searching, thus eliminating repetitive threads, as well as prevent spammers from registering to make ad threads.

2. I'd like to see some better sales system implemented in the classifieds section. For starters, it'd be cool to list a member's "feedback" on the sidebar so that prospective buyers can instantly see their reputation.

3. Is there a way to code the site so that anyone who tries to quote a post that contains a long series of photos is not allowed to do so? It makes reading threads much more tedious and unnecessary.

I am changing my vote to "yes".

50-100 dont you think its too much? maybe 10-30ish??

Originally Posted by 00bmw323

50-100 dont you think its too much? maybe 10-30ish??

Not at all. 10-30 can be achieved pretty quickly, I want there to be a period of time where they can't post so they are forced to search for answers.

Originally Posted by kpeng

Not at all. 10-30 can be achieved pretty quickly, I want there to be a period of time where they can't post so they are forced to search for answers.

hmmm..true that...

Originally Posted by 00bmw323

wat do you have??

Modded Member. I need the entra PM space.

Originally Posted by kpeng

Not at all. 10-30 can be achieved pretty quickly, I want there to be a period of time where they can't post so they are forced to search for answers.

Agreed.



1) I like the idea. Have that on some other forums I'm on.

2) Theres another site that I am on that has a reputation system. The system doesnt allow you to buy or sell anything without a certain amount of reps. You can give people +/- rep depending on their posts/threads/actions.

3) Yeah, you can code it so [IMG] [IMG] are blocked out in quotes. Not sure about vbulletins though.

Originally Posted by kpeng

I would like to be serious for a second here though and propose a few ideas that I'd like to see happen regardless of if I actually, by some miracle of god, become a moderator.

1. I propose that we not allow new members to create new threads of their own until they've hit a certain post count. I don't know, maybe 50 or 100 posts? That will encourage searching, thus eliminating repetitive threads, as well as prevent spammers from registering to make ad threads.

2. I'd like to see some better sales system implemented in the classifieds section. For starters, it'd be cool to list a member's "feedback" on the sidebar so that prospective buyers can instantly see their reputation.

3. Is there a way to code the site so that anyone who tries to quote a post that contains a long series of photos is not allowed to do so? It makes reading threads much more tedious and unnecessary.

actually, i think those are great ideas. especially #1

Originally Posted by snikwad

I'm trying to tell the young boy that while the snow bunnies are def nice, there's too many wonderful flavors to limit yourself to one.

Its just not right. Jolly rancher bags don't come with just apple flavor. There's something for everyone to try a few

AGREED 100% i'm a fan of the more exotic or "modded girl" over the "oem girl". oem doesn't float my boat too much. there are exceptions though, sometimes an oem girl has all needed mods and are like a maserati or astin martin.

Originally Posted by kpeng

I would like to be serious for a second here though and propose a few ideas that I'd like to see happen regardless of if I actually, by some miracle of god, become a moderator.

1. I propose that we not allow new members to create new threads of their own until they've hit a certain post count. I don't know, maybe 50 or 100 posts? That will encourage searching, thus eliminating repetitive threads, as well as prevent spammers from registering to make ad threads.

2. I'd like to see some better sales system implemented in the classifieds section. For starters, it'd be cool to list a member's "feedback" on the sidebar so that prospective buyers can instantly see their reputation.

3. Is there a way to code the site so that anyone who tries to quote a post that contains a long series of photos is not allowed to do so? It makes reading threads much more tedious and unnecessary.

4. Mawfukaz MUST post a price in for sale threads. No more of this bs, PM me your offers and make offer bs.

this thread is an interesting read.

voted YES just bc, and i hope i don't get in trouble for this, some of the mods seem.................................










......distracted.......






..from their duties.