E46 BMW Social Directory E46 FAQ 3-Series Discussion Forums BMW Photo Gallery BMW 3-Series Technical Information E46 Fanatics - The Ultimate BMW Resource BMW Vendors General E46 Forum The Tire Rack's Tire Wheel Forum Forced Induction Forum The Off-Topic The E46 BMW Showroom For Sale, For Trade or Wanting to Buy

Welcome to the E46Fanatics forums. E46Fanatics is the premiere website for BMW 3 series owners around the world with interactive forums, a geographical enthusiast directory, photo galleries, and technical information for BMW enthusiasts.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   E46Fanatics > Everything Else > The Off-Topic > Photography

Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-14-2015, 10:44 AM   #1
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
FS: Canon L Lenses

The work of switching to Sony has begun!

Selling my 24-105 4L IS.

http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/hn...358582605.html

Edit: Decided to keep the 70-200.

Last edited by SamDoe1; 12-30-2015 at 02:25 PM.
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2015, 11:46 AM   #2
NFRs2000nyc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 931
My Ride: S2000+Wrangler
Why not keep the 70-200? Sony doesn't have anything as good, and it seems to work well with the metabones and the a7r2. 24-105 you can safely dump.
__________________
NFRs2000nyc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 10:30 AM   #3
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
Basically it's because I want to go wider and I seriously haven't used it in almost 6 months. It's big, heavy, and cumbersome to lug around to the point that I hate bringing it places. It definitely has its uses but at this point, I don't have a purpose for it. I can snag a Zeiss Batis 20mm for about the value of the 70-200 and have one of the best wide primes in the world. If the lens doesn't sell, I'll keep it.
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 10:32 AM   #4
NFRs2000nyc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 931
My Ride: S2000+Wrangler
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamDoe1 View Post
Basically it's because I want to go wider and I seriously haven't used it in almost 6 months. It's big, heavy, and cumbersome to lug around to the point that I hate bringing it places. It definitely has its uses but at this point, I don't have a purpose for it. I can snag a Zeiss Batis 20mm for about the value of the 70-200 and have one of the best wide primes in the world. If the lens doesn't sell, I'll keep it.
I gotcha...you don't want wider for landscapes? Im a big fan of a 14mm prime and a 16-35. Good luck with the switch, I'm certain you won't be disappointed.
__________________
NFRs2000nyc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 02:24 PM   #5
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
Quote:
Originally Posted by NFRs2000nyc View Post
I gotcha...you don't want wider for landscapes? Im a big fan of a 14mm prime and a 16-35. Good luck with the switch, I'm certain you won't be disappointed.
I have someone who wants to trade my 70-200 for 24mm 1.4L prime. Good trade?

Also, while I like wide, I don't like super wide. My ideal sweet spot is 20-30mm on a FF body.

Last edited by SamDoe1; 12-15-2015 at 02:25 PM.
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 02:42 PM   #6
NFRs2000nyc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 931
My Ride: S2000+Wrangler
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamDoe1 View Post
I have someone who wants to trade my 70-200 for 24mm 1.4L prime. Good trade?

Also, while I like wide, I don't like super wide. My ideal sweet spot is 20-30mm on a FF body.
Well, you're asking me personally, so I'm going to give you my opinion as if someone was offering me this trade....dollar wise, the 24mm is a $1450 lens. The 24-70 is an $1800 lens and the 70-200 2.8 non IS is a $1250 lens....all are current BH prices...so financially, you're making out well. However, IMHO of course, 24mm is good for general vacation range, but only when it's attached to a zoom. It isn't wide enough for many European museums and such, it doesn't create grand landscapes (IMHO) and it's kind of a very limiting option. Furthermore, it's not small....and at 24mm, you'll never shoot wide open because, well.....you just dont. I never shoot my wides below F8, I want maximum sharpness. The 70-200 obviously has limited use, but it does provide shots that no current sony lens can give you, and it does make for some incredible portraits. Landscapes are often amazing as well with the compression of a 70-200....so, IF you are going to be using a canon lens on the a7r2 body, and you are going to trade, I'd want to trade it for a 24-70 f2.8, which is a FANTASTIC lens, and gives you excellent vacation range, great bokeh when you want it, and great landscapes when you want that as well. Sadly sony doesn't yet have a quality zoom at any range, so if you want a good zoom, you'll have to stick with Canon...but the good news is, under around 140mm, Canon zooms work incredibly well on the latest metabones and the a7r2...at 200mm+, it starts to hunt on subjects that are really close.

TLR version....No, it's a pretty limiting lens, don't trade, or trade only for the 24-70 f2.8. You'll be much happier with it.
Honorable mention, the 16-35 F4 is also an excellent lens, don't waste your money on the F2.8, totally not worth it (I own it.)
__________________

Last edited by NFRs2000nyc; 12-15-2015 at 02:44 PM.
NFRs2000nyc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 04:29 PM   #7
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
I wasn't necessarily going to trade....just was offered by someone. I probably won't take the trade since I'd love to have a wider lens as an option. The 24 1.4 is a good lens but for the same cost as a Zeiss prime....meh.

I'll look into the 16-35 f4 but right now, the prices of the 17-40 are rather tempting.

I'm going to go to the camera store and try out canon lenses with the new Sony bodies via adapter. Also, I'm going to pick up the A7II not the A7RII. I can't justify a $3200 body for a hobby.
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 04:37 PM   #8
NFRs2000nyc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 931
My Ride: S2000+Wrangler
Oh forget it...the only camera the canon glass works well with is the a7r2. The a72 and the a7s are worthless, and that isn't even my opinion.


Sell all your canon glass if you're not using the a7r2
__________________
NFRs2000nyc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 05:05 PM   #9
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
The latest update to the PDAF system brings the performance of the A72 on par with the A7R2. Prior to this update, you're right but numerous reviews now put the performance pretty much on par.
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 06:54 PM   #10
NFRs2000nyc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 931
My Ride: S2000+Wrangler
Glad to hear it. However, I am going to put in my $3.25 to you....you can choose to ignore me, but if you take one piece of advice from me, it would be this, and here is why.....I STRONGLY suggest you purchase an A7R2 and the reason is simple...the price difference is $1200. Granted, not chump change. However, since you are not a pheasant, In a pretty small amount of time, you'll forget all about $1200, but you will have a camera that you may have for the next 7+ years...over that amount of time, $1200 is not a big deal in the grand scheme of things, but having supreme image quality, with oodles of crop room, and ultra high resolution with the ability to make incredible 600dpi prints is, to me, worth every penny. I get that $3200 on a hobby is a lot, but remember....first, so is $2000, second, when it comes to camera gear, the better the gear, the stronger the resale. Before mirrorless, high end Canon lenses for instance sold for damn near 95% of their new value. I just couldn't see myself going through the trouble of jumping ship and not getting the best the company has to offer. Just my .02

Just for sh!ts and giggles....they seem to be going for around $2800 on ebay
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sony-Alpha-a...gAAOSwgNRV7-5N
__________________

Last edited by NFRs2000nyc; 12-15-2015 at 06:55 PM.
NFRs2000nyc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2015, 11:04 AM   #11
awesomechinz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: South Bend
Posts: 468
My Ride: 1999 BMW 323i sedan
If only I had the money right now for that 24-105 :/
awesomechinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2015, 02:25 PM   #12
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
^ We can work out a good price for you if you want.

Decided to keep the 70-200 and run with an adapter. Even though I don't use it a ton now, it's a useful lens to have and I know a day will come that I really really wish I had it.
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2015, 10:37 AM   #13
awesomechinz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: South Bend
Posts: 468
My Ride: 1999 BMW 323i sedan
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamDoe1 View Post
^ We can work out a good price for you if you want.

Decided to keep the 70-200 and run with an adapter. Even though I don't use it a ton now, it's a useful lens to have and I know a day will come that I really really wish I had it.
Lol trust me the only thing I can offer is an extremely low ball offer that isn't worth the time. Struggles of college
awesomechinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2016, 05:45 PM   #14
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
lol, you'll get there chinz.
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 09:38 AM   #15
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
Sold the 24-105. Done deal now, Sony here we come (as soon as they announce some fvcking rebates).
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 09:43 AM   #16
NFRs2000nyc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 931
My Ride: S2000+Wrangler
Post up when you buy it!
__________________
NFRs2000nyc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2016, 10:45 AM   #17
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
Will do bro.
SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2016, 01:58 PM   #18
SamDoe1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 3,603
My Ride: 4cyl of fury
Hey Dave, here's a video showing A7II AF performance using adapted lenses pre and post firmware update. It's not native lens fast but it's pretty fvcking good in exchange for the ability to use whatever you want.

SamDoe1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Censor is ON





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
(c) 1999 - 2011 performanceIX Inc - privacy policy - terms of use