![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||
|
Home Improvement
Home Improvement ideas, help, DIYs, and show room. Got a home improvement project you need help with or want to share. Post your project now! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
|
Take from Dolby's site:
Dolby Digital Plus Dolby Digital Plus is a highly sophisticated and versatile audio codec based on Dolby Digital and designed specifically to adapt to the changing demands of future audio, video delivery, and audio storage systems while simultaneously retaining backwards compatibility with the existing Dolby Digital 5.1-channel home theater systems in use today. Broadcast Applications Dolby Digital Plus is ideal for limited bandwidth environments such as broadcast television. As highly efficient video coding systems like H.264 are adopted, broadcasters can deliver increased capability and capacity through new set-top boxes in the same spectrum they are using today, while retaining playback compatibility with existing Dolby Digital A/V receivers. The Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) approved a revision to the A/52A Standard (A/52B) that incorporates Dolby Digital Plus as the high-efficiency audio coding system for robust mode transmission of E-VSB. Dolby Digital Plus is also included in the Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) specifications as an option for HD and other digital TV services. Devices equipped with Dolby Digital Plus are capable of decoding Dolby Digital broadcast bitstreams for compatibility with existing broadcast services. This is sort of what I am talking about. 7.1 and 9.1 capable receivers are few and far between. Such as the Lexicon RV8 pictured here: http://www.lexicon.com/products/overview.asp?ID=14 Like I said, when a movie is fimed and mixed in studio it is encoded with up to 9 channels of audio. Go to a movie theater, what do you see? Thats right, 9 or more speakers. These theaters utilize decoding software and equipment to fully exaggerate the ecoded audio. Receivers for your home would could cost thousands to do the same thing. I take that back. 10's of thousands. But most of the high dollar receivers like I just showed you will do 7.1. This is not some kind of beefed up 5.1 receiver like you would think. If a DVD has the capability to do 7.1 (which most dont) then it will do it. You have to realize residential technology has not caught up to commercial technology yet. Hence the quote at the top of this post....hence the reason I say you will see it shortly... Did that clarify it for you?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Plus..more importantly...Even as a home theater nut, 7.1 is way, way more than enough. I couldn't imagine what a normal consumer would think of that many. If the industry pushes for more channels look for consumers to respond by their wallet vote. The point is..nobody has created a standard that has more than 5.1 channels of discrete sound, in or out of the theater. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Imported Redneck
|
if it's hard to believe what blowne30m3 says, put your recieiver in phantom mode and compare it with regular surround mode.
...most of the time...it sounds as there is something missing...... I was without my center channel for a while, so i had to put my yamaha into phantom where it addedd processing to integrate the center into the L/R speakers. YUK!
__________________
------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
If you are off-center, then you will be out of position for all of the drivers (including the rears). Surround setups are even more sensitive to listener position than stereo setups. The more point-sources you have, the harder it is to create a believable image. That is why stereo is so successful (and quadrophonic, etc failed). It is also the reason why so much emphasis is placed on tuning surround setups with test-tones, etc. I think you were right before (with your first post). Center channel is the least important speaker in a surround setup. I agree 100% with your first post! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
|
You guys are all wrong. The left "presence" channel on those Yamaha 9.1 channel receivers is by FAR the most important channel, unless my dog is half shaved and painted orange, in which case the most important speakers is th right presence speaker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
|
The upgrading of sound formats needs to stop in my opinion. Dolby Digital and DTS sound absolutely fine as is, any more "upgrades" past this point are just so electronics companies can sell new receievers. DD and DTS in their current states are exactly what you get in the theater. Sound really cannot, and should not be improved any further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I agree - they should just stick with 5.1 DTS and focus on making better movies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Imported Redneck
|
Quote:
Room size is 17 x 22, with speakers 2' from wall (which is within recommened range for bipolars)
__________________
------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Imported Redneck
|
Quote:
__________________
------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
TX Dinan 3
|
hey Ryan, you ever done a 9.4 Media Room setup, thats what we are going with at the new house we are about to break ground on
__________________
![]() Dzoccu nun ti appreni, nun dir né mali né beni ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|