E46 BMW Social Directory E46 FAQ 3-Series Discussion Forums BMW Photo Gallery BMW 3-Series Technical Information E46 Fanatics - The Ultimate BMW Resource BMW Vendors General E46 Forum The Tire Rack's Tire Wheel Forum Forced Induction Forum The Off-Topic The E46 BMW Showroom For Sale, For Trade or Wanting to Buy

Welcome to the E46Fanatics forums. E46Fanatics is the premiere website for BMW 3 series owners around the world with interactive forums, a geographical enthusiast directory, photo galleries, and technical information for BMW enthusiasts.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   E46Fanatics > Everything Else > The Off-Topic > Political Talk

Political Talk
You may discuss anything regarding politics in this forum ONLY. If you cannot respect others opinions, your access to this forum will be removed.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-26-2015, 10:53 AM   #1
NOVAbimmer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 12,856
My Ride: 14 Impala FXST M796
Montana state representative seeking campaign finance reform, lobbying group opposes

Go figure, a major lobbying group opposes a bill that would impose some needed campaign finance reform in Montana. Not that Montana needs it especially, but that it's needed everywhere.

https://www.nraila.org/articles/2015...dural-maneuver

text of the bill: https://legiscan.com/MT/text/SB289/2015

Quote:
Yesterday, political speech suppression legislation, Senate Bill 289, was taken from committee and placed on second reading in the House in a procedural maneuver by proponents. Sponsored by state Senator Duane Ankney (R-20), SB 289 seeks to suppress political speech by organizations such as the NRA which informs Second Amendment supporters on election-related issues and updates. This bill would impose restrictions on organizations participating in certain aspects of candidate activism and election advocacy. This legislation creates a high level of uncertainty for organizations that participate and communicate information relating to candidates and elections to individuals in Montana. If enacted, organizations such as the NRA could be required to disclose personal donor information. SB 289 contains many vague sections, leaving the full extent of the bill's reach unclear. Other concerns are raised since a large amount of discretion and decision-making is left up to the Commissioner of Political Practices, including determinations of who would be affected under this bill without clear guidance or definition currently present in the legislation. For more information about this bill and the NRA's opposition, please click here.

Even though Senate Bill 289 does not mention the word "firearm" once in the voluminous twenty-seven pages of proposed law, it may actually be the most important firearms rights bill of the 2015 legislative session.

Senate Bill 289 could be brought up for a vote as early as tomorrow. It is imperative that you contact your state Representative and politely urge him or her to OPPOSE Senate Bill 289 when it comes up for a vote. Contact information for your state Representative can be found here.
It's pretty apparent where the NRA assumes the reading skills of Montana residents to be with their line about "voluminous twenty-seven pages". It's a quick read.

It seems like a great idea, and it's good to see an elected official looking to take a stand against big-money politics. Limiting campaign contributions. Requiring full disclosure on all campaign materials. Restricting campaign contributions to political committees and individuals, rather than corporate and union interests. Requiring candidates and officials to publicly disclose who is financing them.

But, unfortunately, as long as money is defined as speech and corporations are people, this law will be unconstitutional.

The fact that the NRA is vehemently opposed to this attempt makes me more glad that I stopped paying them dues.
__________________

Last edited by NOVAbimmer; 03-26-2015 at 10:55 AM.
NOVAbimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2015, 10:55 AM   #2
Lair
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Liberal Paradise
Posts: 337
My Ride: e90,e90, $5k Boxster
__________________
Lair is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Censor is ON





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
(c) 1999 - 2011 performanceIX Inc - privacy policy - terms of use