E46 BMW Social Directory E46 FAQ 3-Series Discussion Forums BMW Photo Gallery BMW 3-Series Technical Information E46 Fanatics - The Ultimate BMW Resource BMW Vendors General E46 Forum The Tire Rack's Tire Wheel Forum Forced Induction Forum The Off-Topic The E46 BMW Showroom For Sale, For Trade or Wanting to Buy

Welcome to the E46Fanatics forums. E46Fanatics is the premiere website for BMW 3 series owners around the world with interactive forums, a geographical enthusiast directory, photo galleries, and technical information for BMW enthusiasts.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   E46Fanatics > Everything Else > The Off-Topic > Political Talk

Political Talk
You may discuss anything regarding politics in this forum ONLY. If you cannot respect others opinions, your access to this forum will be removed.

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-26-2013, 09:07 AM   #1
Registered User
phrozen06's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 3927'33"N 7758'04"W
Posts: 7,556
My Ride: E46, E92 M3, R32 VW
Send a message via Yahoo to phrozen06
Article V Convention To Amend Constitution Pushed By Several States


03/25/2013 5:47 pm EDT

At least three states are seeking to force a constitutional convention to consider changes to the founding document.

Indiana, Georgia and Kansas have proposed a convention under the Constitution's Article V, which allows two-thirds of the states to call a convention. The states' reasons range from balancing the federal budget to overhauling federal powers. A constitutional convention has not been convened since the original one in 1787.

Forty-nine of the 50 states have filed at least one resolution with Congress calling for a constitutional convention. In order for a convention to be held, at least 34 states must pass a resolution on the same subject.

Sanford Levinson, a law professor at the University of Texas who backs an Article V convention, said the process is designed to be hard. "People who don't like the idea of a convention, which is most people, want to make it impossible," Levinson said.

Resolutions in Kansas and Indiana call for a constitutional convention to balance powers of states and the federal government. Georgia's calls for the inclusion of a balanced budget amendment. The Indiana resolution -- passed by the state Senate -- gives broad outlines, while the Kansas resolution specifies that education, guns, health care, insurance and elections are strictly state powers with no role for the federal government.

"The idea is that the federal government never wants to limit its power," Kansas state Rep. Brett Hildabrand (R-Shawnee), a sponsor of his state's resolution, told HuffPost. "Most of the amendments are to expand the scope of the federal government. Except for the Bill of Rights, everything expands power."

Some backers of a constitutional convention said they worry conventioneers could range beyond resolutions to amend any part of the Constitition. Hildabrand said he had such concerns, but was assured by Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R), that constitutional safeguards prevent a so-called runaway convention, requiring changes be approved by three-fourths of the states. Similar reasoning was used in the Indiana Senate debate.

Hildabrand said that he and other Kansas backers of a convention plan a national campaign to get other states to join the effort. He said they plan pressure conservative states, including Texas and Wyoming, to pass resolutions similar to the one in Kansas.

Levinson said its unclear whether convention delegates would be elected or picked by state legislatures. He said he wants an Article V convention that would "last for two years and is on CSPAN and holds serious hearings on the whole thing."

Levinson said he doesn't see states rushing to join the Kansas plan. "There is no way two-thirds of the states will get behind such a radical-right proposition," he said.

Will this work?
phrozen06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2013, 10:34 AM   #2
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Liberal Paradise
Posts: 346
My Ride: e90,e90, $5k Boxster
Let me guess: NO democrats are behind this movement.
The Hunter S Thompson of e46f.

Lair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2013, 10:45 AM   #3
Registered User
phrozen06's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 3927'33"N 7758'04"W
Posts: 7,556
My Ride: E46, E92 M3, R32 VW
Send a message via Yahoo to phrozen06
Originally Posted by Lair View Post
Let me guess: NO democrats are behind this movement.
Maybe a few blue dog democrats but we'll see.
phrozen06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2013, 12:21 PM   #4
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 115
My Ride: 2001 M3 Coupe
I've always found it ironic that many if those who bray such reverence and strict fealty to some "originalist" interpretation of the Constitution are so eager to change, expand and amend it.

After I read the word "Kansas" in the story, a state hellbent on devolving back to some medieval quasi-theocracy, well, I read the rest with due hilarity. Basically this has about a .02% chance of occurring.

Last edited by Rhumb; 03-26-2013 at 12:22 PM.
Rhumb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2013, 04:35 PM   #5
VaderDave's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
Posts: 11,930
My Ride: 330CiC ZHP
This seems like a non-starter to me.
VaderDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2013, 04:37 PM   #6
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 760
My Ride: is a ///M
will this be like Texas petitioning to secede from the Union?

reference thread:


Last edited by MDydinanM; 03-26-2013 at 04:38 PM.
MDydinanM is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Censor is ON

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
(c) 1999 - 2011 performanceIX Inc - privacy policy - terms of use